-
Comment: The decline of French winter resorts is no bad thing
Nick Inman says it is high time to let nature reclaim the mountains
-
Letters: Dismissal of French satirist shows freedom of speech is in danger
Connexion reader says comedians must be permitted to provoke our thoughts and prejudices
-
Letters: Vegetarian options are too limited in France
Connexion readers say French cuisine is all the poorer due to its reliance on meat
Why do French restaurants have such bright lighting?
'A blight on France' is what former Minister of Culture of France, Jack Lang, called France's suburban developments, which he connects to a lack of serious art training in the French education system
On the 30th anniversary of one of former culture minister Jack Lang’s pet projects the Journées du Patrimoine, in 2014, he published an extended essay entitled Ouvrons les yeux! La nouvelle bataille du patrimoine.
In it, he attacked the rise of suburban developments comprising endless ugly roundabouts, advertising hoardings and out-of-town retail parks.
They were, he declared, a blight on France.
I interviewed him about the subject and, with enormous political delicacy, he linked the problem to a lack of serious art training in the French education system.
I agree that even sport is taken more seriously than art, which is regarded as a niche subject for creative types, rather than a vital part of a rounded education.
Even when art is taught, the approach is invariably rigorously intellectual rather then aesthetic
Siding with Jack, I was ready to support the introduction of Roundabout Appreciation on the curriculum if it stopped impenetrable shopping jungles springing up around every town in France, like so many thorny hedges protecting Sleeping Beauty’s castle.
Come to think of it, many town centres are actually snoring, if not entirely dead...
A few linger on, however, refusing to roll over just yet.
There are even one or two brave restaurants opening in the evenings, and I cannot agree with Jonathan Miller who had a bash at French restaurants in The Spectator earlier this year for bad cooking.
There are lots of nice local restaurants in my corner of the Hexagon offering excellent home-cooked meals. What is less palatable, however, is the harsh lighting inside them.
I can deal with the hideous orange walls, grey chairs, and strange plastic flowers. I really like the fact that ‘vegetables’ usually just means French beans. I am even so used to French waiting staff that if they smile, I feel nervous.
But I do have a problem with the illumination – in nine out of 10 French restaurants, it is terrifyingly bright.
Sitting under dazzling arc lights makes me feel like I’m in a documentary.
There is no need for it. I can see perfectly well without the glare.
What’s wrong with the warm glow of a fire, candlelight, a few discreet lamps around the place? I am not asking to eat in pitch darkness.
I would just like to stop squinting against bulbs brighter than the midday sun.
I wonder what restaurateurs are thinking when they install such lighting.
Are bright bulbs cheaper? Do they last longer? Do they discourage diners from canoodling in corners? Or let them take better food photos for Instagram? I don’t think so.
Despite Jack Lang’s noble efforts to improve arts education in France, I think it is because aesthetics remains a low priority. It is not really taught in school, so simply isn’t generally a consideration.
Restaurants need lights, yes? And industrial zones need roundabouts and advertising. Function over refinement.
That’s the French way.
Related stories
'Why can’t France cherish what the world loves about their country?'
Student aims to visit all France's 101 prefectures: 45 visited already